Friday, 4 May 2012

End of WEB101 inc Exegasis.

What an amazing unit this was, I got a HD for this blog and am very very proud!

I have moved the contributing Nodes to this section so I can continue to use this blog for other units.

Just to recap, we needed to select at least 3 Web2.0 platforms and I chose Flickr, YouTube and Mixpod to share.

Thanks for following :-)

K

P.S. Just for storage purposes, below is my exegesis for this assignment:


My critical explanation of my web presence

When thinking about my web presence and how I wanted my online self to be presented, I took into consideration the things that are prominent in my current life. After assessing this, I felt it best to use the concept of my London life, considering my initial audience would be mostly Australian students. When creating my internet footprint (Leaver, 2011), I wanted to make sure that my online identity remained something I would be satisfied with representing me for many years to come, for many people to see. Most importantly, I wanted my web presence to act as a creative outlet for my offline self.

The development of the web presence required me to start with an identity and a themed concept. The use of three WEB2.0 platforms to contribute content is also required. During the design and content conception, considerations were given to the impact of my internet footprint created by the web presence, and the best way in which I can use audio and visual tools to help establish my online self. I chose blogger to create a blog whereby I could post a candid account of my life in London using images taken uploaded direclty from my android phone, along with London related topics . Blogger was a good choice due to the tools offered and the connection blogger holds with many Web2.0 platforms. Blogger is extremely flexible in designing the layout also and with my knowledge of HTML I was able to adjust heights and widths to fit my various widgets in appropriatly.

My “London Life” themed blog, uses content from my personal profiles on Flickr, YouTube and Mixpod chosen so I can include audio visual content in each blog post. Any content used has been done so either with permission or utilised under creative commons licencing. The nature of these open source cultures (Wolk, 2009) reaffirm the ideal of my web presence as being a creative outlet. These contributing nodes along with the visual design of the site have led to a structured and informative representation of my online self. My desired affect is to have an audience for my blog that find the blog easy to read and use.

I have used an about page to introduce myself and give the viewer a good idea of what they can expect from the blog. By using a photograph on my about page, I am creating a visual representation of my online indentity while holding a good level of anonymity. I also utilise this section to establish where I am getting my content from and where the viewer can seek out the appropriate credits for the content.

The concept behind the blog name, The Pony and the Kilburn Fox, is a combination of my personal nickname and local street art in my London neighbourhood of a fox symbol. I have chosen to give myself the pseudonym of “the.pony” which is present throughout my profiles on each node. I didn’t want to use my real name in these profiles as I wanted to keep a level of anonymity an minimal self disclosure (Qian, 2007)  to my web presence.  The colouring and design was kept basic using only shades of black and white, with highlights of red for additional visual stimulation. The imagery used for the design of my header is a combination of two images found on Flickr and Google images with the permission of the creators, which I have redesigned using Adobe Photoshop CS5.

When assessing the various Web2.0 platforms available to use, I considered which platforms were are fair representation of the presence I am wanting to create. The three contributing nodes I have chosen (Flickr, YouTube and Mixpod) are Web2.0 platforms that offer three different artistic content sharing outlets in the form of photo’s, film and music. These three outlets represent my artistic preference well and therefore hold a positive reflection of my offline self within my internet presence. All three nodes are clearly visible to the reader on each blog post and page and my profiles for each can be accessed easily using the links provided. More importantly, all three utilise the use of Folksomies where by the users of each site organise the uploaded content using metadata, which can be added by any user (Mathes, 2004). This was important to me to incorporate into my presence as the use of metadata has a strong impact on search engines and the more tagging used that leads an internet user to my various profiles, the increased chances I have of gaining a larger audience.

My choice of Web2.0 platforms was also based on the share factor. At the bottom of each post, is a widget by which the viewer can share a link to the post through various online tools and social networking platforms. The use of this widget means a compelled viewer of my blog may share the blog and content with their social network. The use of these widgets was described by Helmond (2010) as used to embed the scattered web self into one place, which aids my purpose of easy access within my blog.

 I have also used an additional page titled “Credits” within the blog to pay homage to each contributing node. On this page I have embedded a logo of each which again links the user back to my profiles for each node.


My London Life web presence is one that has been designed and thought through with every aspect of the internet and my online representation in mind. Using three contributing nodes with a mixture of my own creations and others who are happy to share, helps me approach each blog post as a creative outlet. The use of metadata throughout each blog post and piece of content used is an important part of creating a presence that will be seen by others. Overall, the design and content shared is a respectable representation of my online identity and one I will be proud of in years to come.

Helmond, A (2010, January) Identity 2.0: Constructing identity with cultural Software. Retrieved from http://www.annehelmond.nl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads//2010/01/helmond_identity20_dmiconference.pdf

Leaver, T (2011) Module 3 Introduction - Your Internet Footprint [Course Notes] Retrieved from http://lms.curtin.edu.au

Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies – Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Retrieved on (2011, August7). Retrieved from http://lms.curtin.edu.au/courses/1/305033-Vice-Chancell-1118175685/content/_1253746_1/dir_Web101.zip/Web101/2.4.html

Qian, H & Scott, C.R (2007, August 23) Anonymity and Self Disclosure on Weblogs. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x

Wolk, D (2009, June 15) Future of Open Source: Collaborative Culture. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/dualperspectives/article/news/2009/06/dp_opensource_wired0616